Prospective study evaluates shear wave ultrasound elastography to predict shock wave lithotripsy outcomes in patients with renal stones, suggesting a non-invasive alternative.
Purpose: To evaluate the use of shear wave ultrasound elastography (SWUE) in prediction of outcomes of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) for medium-sized renal stones and to correlate HU and SWUE values with the chemical stone compositions. Materials and Methods: A total of 110 patients with medium-sized renal stones were scheduled for SWL and included. The patients were assessed by non-contrast CT and SWUE. The patients were categorized into two groups: Group A, SWL success, included 80 patients; and Group B, SWL failure, included 30 patients. Baseline data, stone characteristics, and kilopascal (kPa) values were assessed and compared in both groups. Results: The mean age of studied patients was 42.44 ± 11.45 and 43.50 ± 13.20 years in Groups A and B, respectively ( p = 0.679). The mean body mass index of Group A was 25.41 ± 2.93 and Group B was 26.28 ± 2.74 ( p = 0.161). The median (interquartile range [IQR]) of HU of stones was 858.5 (778.0–967.0) in Group A versus 1075.0 (1010.0–1150.0) in Group B ( p < 0.001). The median (IQR) of kPa values of renal stones was 10.05 (8.20–13.0) in Group A versus 18.20 (15.60–19.20) in Group B ( p < 0.001). The median (IQR) of skin-to-stone distance was 85.50 (80.0–92.0) in Group A versus 96.0 (89.0–105.0) in Group B ( p < 0.001). Conclusions: SWUE could be used as a non-invasive and safe alternative method to detect the hardness of stones and predict the outcomes of SWL and the chemical stone compositions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zoeir et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: