Randomized trial evaluates internet-based exercise reducing depression and anxiety, indicating a potential scalable treatment option.
Background Depression and anxiety frequently co-occur and impose substantial public health burdens. Although established treatments are effective, barriers to access and engagement remain. Internet-based exercise may offer a scalable complement to existing treatment options. This review evaluated its effects on depressive and anxiety symptoms. Methods This systematic review and meta-analysis was reported in accordance with PRISMA 2020 and registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251131843). We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of Internet-delivered structured exercise compared with non-exercise controls and reporting validated measures of depression and/or anxiety. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and EBSCOhost were searched, supplemented by manual searches. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to calculate standardised mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results Thirteen RCTs were included. Eleven trials comprising 1,066 participants contributed to the depressive symptom meta-analysis, and seven trials comprising 607 participants contributed to the anxiety symptom meta-analysis. Internet-based exercise was associated with statistically significant reductions in depressive symptoms (SMD = − 0.53, 95% CI − 0.80 to − 0.26; I² = 77.2%) and anxiety symptoms (SMD = − 0.41, 95% CI − 0.65 to − 0.17; I² = 48.9%). Most trials were rated as having some concerns regarding risk of bias (11/13), primarily related to outcome measurement. The certainty of evidence was low for depressive symptoms and moderate for anxiety symptoms. Conclusion Internet-based exercise may reduce depressive and anxiety symptoms and may serve as a scalable nonpharmacological complement to existing treatments. However, the findings should be interpreted cautiously because of substantial heterogeneity in depressive outcomes and limitations in the certainty of evidence. Further high-quality trials are needed to clarify long-term effects and implementation considerations. Registration PROSPERO CRD420251131843. Clinical trial number Not applicable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jia et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: