Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates improved protein complex quality assessment, indicating better model evaluation tools.
Accurate quality assessment of predicted protein–protein complex structures remains a major challenge. Existing graph-based quality assessment methods often treat the entire complex as a homogeneous graph, which obscures the physical distinction between intrachain folding stability and interchain binding specificity. In this study, we introduce TriGraphQA, a novel triple graph learning framework designed for model quality assessment of protein complexes. TriGraphQA explicitly decouples monomeric and interfacial representations by constructing three geometric views: two residue-node graphs capturing the local folding environments of individual chains, and a dedicated contact-node graph representing the binding interface. Crucially, we propose an interface context aggregation module to project context-rich embeddings from the monomers onto the interface, effectively fusing multiscale structural features. We conducted comprehensive tests on several challenging benchmark data sets, including Dimer50, DBM55-AF2, and HAF2. The results show that TriGraphQA significantly outperforms state-of-the-art single-model methods. TriGraphQA consistently achieves the highest global scoring correlations and lower top-ranking losses. Consequently, TriGraphQA provides a powerful evaluation tool for protein–protein docking, facilitating the reliable identification of near-native assemblies in large-scale structural modeling and molecular recognition studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: