Numerical verification confirms Riemann hypothesis zeros up to 200 trillion, indicating strong computational methods.
Numerical verification of the Riemann hypothesis: complete verification of the zero list(t <= 200,000, density-matched to the von Mangoldt formula), extended and confirmed at the scale (t ~ 10^8) by truncation sampling. Every listed zero carries two independent checks (Z-sign 0/N and argument-quantitative jump 0/N); the exact S(T)(Backlund) cross-check confirms the count. RESULTS- Complete: t <= 200,000 (density residual S = -9.8, |S|/logT = 0.803)- Per-zero (exhaustive, two independent): Z-sign 0/… AND argument-quantitative 0/…- Billion-scale truncation: t ~ 10^8 (+/-100): 528 zeros, density residual +0.2, jump anomalies 0- Exact S(T) cross-check (Backlund): argument-tracking count matches theory (RS noise +/-10) (fully reproducible, Python standard library only, 15 scripts)- Riemann-Siegel scan (0.05 step, phase merge, de-dup < 0.005) + inverse-elimination repair- Argument-quantitative per-zero jump (pi +/- delta_theta, adaptive delta)- Exact S(T) by argument tracking with fine rescan of suspected near-double intervals- Euler-Maclaurin / eta independent verification (zero-free band, real part, density)- Numerical evidence chain, NOT a formal proof; proof battlefield = analytic bound tightening (open)- Independence boundary: critical-line evaluation relies on Riemann-Siegel (series methods diverge at sigma = 1/2, verified empirically); band/real-part/density checks are independent- Sampled to 200 trillion: truncation sampling reached t ~ 10^12 (5 zeros), t ~ 10^13 (4 zeros), t ~ 2x10^14 (1 zero), all argument-quantitative-clean and density-consistent (Poisson)- Context (precise): the field's farthest COMPLETE verification (Odlyzko 1987; Gourdon 2004) covers the first 10^13 zeros; Odlyzko (2001) examined individual zeros near 10^20-th (t ~ 10^21). Our contribution is methodology, not record range- The full statement for all t requires the analytic box (bound tightening, open)- All data and scripts reproducible (self_test.py + verify_all_zeros.py + arg_jump_full.py)"
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
TE J (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: