Framework demonstrates zeta-zero verification methods, suggesting efficiency in mathematical proofs.
Concise summary of a reproducible quantitative framework for zeta-zero verification: Criterion 1 (argument-quantitative jump = pi +/- delta_theta iff exactly one zero, with Riemann-Siegel error bound, Gabcke constant); Criterion 2 (lock-circle geometry); five-dimensional omission sweep (0 off-line candidates); grid/Taylor refinement; three-tool off-line detection. 298,190 zeros complete (t <= 200,000), truncation sampling to 2x10^14. Pure Python, fully reproducible. NOT a proof of the Riemann hypothesis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
TE J (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: