This theoretical paper explores justice-based climate duties regarding past emissions and offsetting.
Our past emissions continue to do harm. What are the moral implications of this fact? In this paper I argue that the long atmospheric lifetime of carbon dioxide in particular has profound impacts on our justice-based climate duties. It necessitates reaching the point of ‘lifetime net-zero’ emissions rather than just ‘present net-zero’ emissions. Since for almost all of us this is only possible by achieving ‘net-negative’ carbon footprints for a period of time, and we can only go ‘net-negative’ by offsetting, it implies a justice-based duty to offset. I furthermore argue that while reaching ‘lifetime net-zero’ is demanded by a duty of justice to harm as little as possible, there is no way to fully stop harming by emitting once one has emitted in the past.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lukas Tank (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: