Cross-sectional study shows significant links between physical activity and severe multimorbidity in older adults, suggesting new evaluation methods.
Background: Multimorbidity imposes a substantial burden on older populations, yet research neglects how physical activity (PA) relates to severe disease burden in established cases. Moreover, the efficacy of combining low-cost PA assessments with routine indicators to identify high-burden patients in resource-constrained settings remains unclear. This study explores associations between PA levels and severe multimorbidity (≥4 conditions), evaluating PA’s utility for auxiliary status identification via interpretable machine learning. Methods: This cross-sectional study included the CHARLS 2018 sample (n = 10,130) and a supplementary community sample (n = 315). Multivariable logistic regression evaluated associations between PA and severe multimorbidity. An XGBoost model assessed routine indicators’ classification performance, utilizing SHAP values to analyze feature contributions to the model. Results: PA was inversely associated with severe multimorbidity specifically among those meeting the WHO criteria (MPA > 300 or VPA > 150 min/week) for additional health benefits (OR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.73–0.88, p < 0.001), especially in adults ≥60 years. Although models using solely routine indicators showed modest discrimination (AUC = 0.673), SHAP analysis revealed PA as the foremost modifiable behavioral feature in classification, with local patterns aligning closely with regression findings. Conclusions: Among middle-aged and older adults with multimorbidity, PA levels exhibit significant categorical associations with severe multimorbidity. In community management, low-cost PA evaluation serves as an auxiliary indicator to preliminarily classify high-burden individuals. Given potential reverse causality, future longitudinal cohorts are required to clarify causal relationships, providing direct evidence for daily activity management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: