Key result
An 8-session dyadic program for breast cancer survivors and spouses substantially improves physical activity levels.
Why the study?
Does an 8-session dyadic physical activity behavioral promotion program improve physical activity levels and well-being in breast cancer survivors and their spouses?
Does an 8-session dyadic physical activity behavioral promotion program improve physical activity levels and well-being in breast cancer survivors and their spouses?
Standardized Mean Difference: 0.71
p-value: p=<.05
A dyadic physical activity promotion program is feasible and acceptable for breast cancer survivors and their spouses, potentially improving physical activity and well-being.
May support dyadic PA promotion during chemotherapy; hypothesis-generating, requiring RCTs before practice change.
Background: Physical activity (PA) alleviates the symptoms of breast cancer survivors and improves their spouses’ wellness. Nevertheless, insufficient dyadic PA behavior among patient-spouse dyads constrains their PA levels. Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a dyadic PA behavioral promotion program for breast cancer survivors during chemotherapy and their spouses. Methods: Fifteen patient-spouse dyads from a tertiary general hospital were enrolled in this single-arm pilot study and received an 8-session dyadic PA behavioral promotion intervention across 2 chemotherapy cycles. The feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of the intervention were evaluated using t tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, and effect sizes were calculated to estimate intervention effects. Results: Rates of recruitment (57.69%), retention (73.33%), and participation (84.71%) indicated good feasibility, and the high overall satisfaction score (4.85 ± 0.36), together with participant feedback, demonstrated high acceptability. PA levels (both P < .05, d = 0.71, d = 0.67) and marital intimacy ( P < .01, d = 1.22; P < .05, d = 0.94) were significantly improved in both patients and their spouses. In addition, patients’ quality of life was significantly improved ( P < .05, d = 0.91), and spouses’ sleep disturbance was reduced ( P < .05, d = 0.75). Conclusions: The dyadic PA behavioral promotion program was feasible and acceptable and may help improve PA levels and reduce symptom burden. Implications for Oncology Nursing Practice: Dyadic PA promotion interventions can be integrated into routine supportive care to enhance physical and mental well-being and health-promoting behaviors among patients and their spouses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2026) studied Breast cancer (n=30). Dyadic physical activity behavioral promotion program was evaluated on Physical activity levels (d = 0.71, p=<.05). An 8-session dyadic physical activity promotion program for breast cancer survivors and their spouses was feasible, acceptable, and significantly improved physical activity levels (P<.05, d=0.71).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: