Key result
A couple-based physical activity videoconference intervention was acceptable to cancer survivors and their partners, with 78% of intervention dyads completing all 4 sessions.
Why the study?
Does a couple-based physical activity videoconference intervention improve physical activity and well-being in sedentary cancer survivors and their partners?
RCT (n=40)
randomized
Does a couple-based physical activity videoconference intervention improve physical activity and well-being in sedentary cancer survivors and their partners?
A couple-based physical activity videoconference intervention is acceptable and feasible for cancer survivors, showing preliminary benefits in physical activity and well-being.
Pilot acceptability supports larger RCT of couple-based PA in cancer survivors; efficacy and adherence effects remain untested.
No abstract yet. The journal hasn't published one we can show.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Porter et al. (2018) conducted an RCT in Breast and prostate cancer (n=40). Couple-based physical activity videoconference intervention vs. Waitlist control was evaluated on Acceptability and feasibility. A couple-based physical activity videoconference intervention was acceptable to cancer survivors and their partners, with 78% of intervention dyads completing all 4 sessions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: