Validates the MID-60 for assessing dissociation in clinical populations, indicating reliable screening effectiveness.
The Multidimensional Inventory of Dissociation-60 (MID-60) was validated in adults in clinical care using data from 13,177 de-identified assessments on an Australian online psychometric platform. Analyses used subsamples defined by available measures for factor, reliability, and validity testing. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the intended 11-factor structure, with good conventional fit and acceptable robust fit after correction for non-normality. Internal consistency (α = .98) and short-interval test–retest reliability were high. The MID-60 converged strongly with the Dissociative Experiences Scale II (DES-II; r = .80) yet was able to identify milder clinical presentations that the DES-II cut-off often misses. Convergence with the International Trauma Questionnaire ( r = .64) and graded associations with the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 ( r = .50) supported links to trauma symptoms and disability. MID-60 scores decreased over repeated administrations of 2 to 12 months. Findings confirm the MID-60 as a reliable, valid, and clinically sensitive measure for screening, formulation, and progress monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kate et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: