Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective cohort study compares sclerotherapy outcomes in neonates and infants, suggesting Pingyangmycin may be safer.
To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy for macrocystic and mixed head and neck lymphatic malformation (LM) in neonates and young infants, and to compare the outcomes of Pingyangmycin versus OK-432 while exploring the impact of intervention timing on prognosis. A retrospective historical cohort study was conducted on 30 infants (age ≤ 90 days) with head and neck LM treated between 2018 and 2024. In adherence to the STROBE statement, we report the study design and findings. Patients were categorized into an earlier OK-432 group ( n = 14) and a later Pingyangmycin group ( n = 16). Subgroup analysis was performed by stratifying patients into a neonatal group (≤ 28 days) and a young infant group (29–90 days). The overall clinical cure rate was 96.7%. (1) Impact of Age: The single-session cure rate was numerically higher in neonates than in young infants (85.7% vs. 56.3%), demonstrating a favorable clinical trend despite the limited sample size ( P = 0.12 by Fisher’s exact test). (2) Sclerosing Agents: Clinical cure rates were comparable between the Pingyangmycin (100%) and OK-432 (92.9%) groups ( P = 0.47). However, regarding safety, the Pingyangmycin group exhibited a lower incidence of adverse events compared to the OK-432 group (6.3% vs. 28.6%, P = 0.15). Severe inflammatory responses occurred only in the OK-432 group. No major acute or long-term complications, such as anaphylaxis, pulmonary fibrosis, or nerve injury, occurred in any patient. Ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy is highly effective for head and neck LM in infants aged ≤ 90 days. Neonatal intervention yields a favorable trend toward single-session efficacy. Compared with OK-432, Pingyangmycin demonstrates a more favorable safety profile, suggesting it as a promising alternative sclerosing agent for this specific population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: