Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reveals competing magnetic order in EuPd3Si2, indicating complex structural influences.
Single crystals of EuPd3Si2 were grown using a high-temperature EuPd-flux method. The material was structurally and chemically characterized by single-crystal x-ray diffraction, powder x-ray diffraction, Laue method and energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy. The structural analysis confirmed the orthorhombic crystal structure (space group Imma) but revealed differences in the lattice parameters and bond distances. The composition is close to the ideal 1:3:2 stoichiometry with an occupation of 7 % of the Si sites by Pd. The heat capacity, electrical resistivity, and magnetic susceptibility show two magnetic transitions indicating magnetic ordering below TN1 = 61 K and a spin reorientation at TN2 = 40 K. The orthorhombic material shows magnetic anisotropy, with anisotropy constants K₁ = 7.1 × 10⁵ J/m³ and K₂ = 4.2 × 10⁵ J/m³, for field applied along the three main symmetry axes, which is summarized in the temperature-field phase diagrams. The susceptibility data hint to an alignment of the magnetic moments along [100] between TN1 and TN2. Below TN2 the magnetic structure changes to an arrangement with moments canted away from [100]. The single crystals investigated in this study are suggested to show antiferromagnetic (AFM) order below TN1 instead of ferromagnetism that sets in at higher TC1 = 78 K which might originate from certain differences in the structure, composition or defects that have an impact on the dominant coupling constants of the RKKY interaction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ocker et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: