Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Qualitative analysis reveals how internal branding coordinates institutional identity across universities, indicating governance's role.
Universities increasingly use branding to articulate institutional distinctiveness within competitive and globally interconnected higher education systems. However, existing research largely treats internal branding as a managerial communication practice, paying limited attention to how it operates within the governance environments of public universities. This study conceptualizes internal branding as a governance-mediated process of institutional identity coordination and examines how it is interpreted and enacted across national higher education contexts. Using a qualitative comparative design, the study analyzes four public universities in Germany, the Netherlands, Brazil, and Pakistan. Drawing on the Consolidated Internal Branding Framework (CIBF), it is based on 65 semi-structured interviews with faculty, administrators, and students, complemented by documentary analysis. The findings show that internal branding does not diffuse uniformly but operates through distinct governance modes shaped by leadership coordination, communication infrastructures, HRM integration, resource capacity, and institutional identity narratives. The study contributes by demonstrating how governance environments shape internal branding and by identifying governance modes through which institutional identity is coordinated in public universities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rehman et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: