The report postulates that men are good at doing that which machines are not good at doing and machines are good at doing that which men are not good at doing. Thus men and machines are not comparable, but complementary, and the term 'allocation of tasks to men and machine' becomes meaningless. Rather a task must be done by men and machines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nehemiah Jordan (1963) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: