Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We have studied the unidirectional anisotropy field (H/sub UA/) and coercivity (H/sub CE/) in exchange-coupled Ni-Fe/Fe-Mn, Ni-Fe/Ni-Mn and NiO/Ni-Fe films as functions of thickness and temperature, and evaluated these films for the stabilization of magnetoresistive (MR) sensors. The as-deposited Ni-Fe/Fe-Mn and NiO/Ni-Fe films exhibit strong exchange coupling, while the Ni-Fe/Ni-Mn films require annealing to enhance exchange coupling. Both H/sub UA/ and H/sub CE/ follow an inverse dependence of the Ni-Fe film thickness in all cases, as expected from the interface nature of exchange coupling. The Fe-Mn film thickness required for the onset of exchange coupling is much smaller than the Ni-Mn and NiO film thicknesses. The thermal stability of the Ni-Fe/Ni-Mn films is superior to that of the Ni-Fe/Fe-Mn and NiO/Ni-Fe films. To explain annealing effects on exchange coupling in the Ni-Fe/Ni-Mn films, we propose an exchange-coupling model consistent with models applied to the Ni-Fe/Fe-Mn and NiO/Ni-Fe films in previous studies. Uniform-field tests of the MR sensors longitudinally biased by the three types of exchange-coupled films show quiet and stable MR responses in all cases. We evaluate the exchange-coupled films based on desired properties for the sensor stabilization, and then discuss their merits and deficiencies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: