Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
May 13, 2015Journal of Hip Preservation SurgeryOpen Access

Open treatment of dysplasia—other than PAO: does it have to be a PAO?

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Why the study?

Do augmental and pelvic osteotomies other than PAO have a place in the current treatment algorithm for the dysplastic hip?

Population

Patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip

Design

Review

Follow-up

minimum 11 years

Authors

KSKotaro R. ShibataSMShuichi MatsudaMSMarc R. Safran

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Other osteotomies may retain niche roles in hip dysplasia; leaves open whether PAO should supplant all alternatives.

Structured PICO

Do augmental and pelvic osteotomies other than PAO have a place in the current treatment algorithm for the dysplastic hip?

P
Population
Patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip
I
Intervention
Augmental osteotomies and pelvic osteotomies other than the Bernese periacetabular osteotomy (PAO)
O
Outcome
Long-term survivorship (minimum 11-year)

This review assesses the long-term outcomes of non-PAO pelvic osteotomies for hip dysplasia to determine their current role in joint preservation.

Cite This Study

Shibata et al. (2015) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a759509756843cacbb2178chttps://doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnv028
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1ROTATIONAL ACETABULAR OSTEOTOMY IN PATIENTS FORTY-SIX YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER2003 · 96 citations
  2. 2A Modified Technique of the Triple Pelvic Osteotomy: Early Results1981 · 225 citations