Why the study?
The management of patients with AF requiring PCI has evolved significantly, and updated guidelines seek to aid physicians in balancing bleeding and thrombotic risks.
How have antithrombotic discharge prescription patterns changed over 10 years for patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing PCI?
How have antithrombotic discharge prescription patterns changed over 10 years for patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing PCI?
Over a 10-year period, oral anticoagulation and DOAC use at discharge significantly increased among AF patients undergoing PCI, aligning closely with guideline recommendations by 2019.
Antithrombotic regimens in AF-PCI patients aligned with CCS guidelines by 2019; extends evidence of guideline and trial influence on real-world uptake.
Background The management of atrial fibrillation and/or flutter (AF) patients requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has evolved significantly. The Canadian Cardiovascular Society AF guidelines, last updated in 2020, seek to aid physicians in balancing both bleeding and thrombotic risks. Methods A tertiary academic centre registry of patients with AF who had PCI was examined for the antithrombotic therapy at discharge in 4 time periods (cohort 2010–2011; cohort 2014–2015; cohort 2017; cohort 2019). Discharge prescription patterns were compared among the cohorts, using the χ 2 test. In addition, antithrombotic management in cohorts 2017 and 2019 were compared to guideline-expected therapy, using the χ 2 test. Results A total of 576 AF patients undergoing PCI were included. Clinical and procedural characteristics were similar among cohorts, except for an increase in drug-eluting stent use in the most recent cohort (94% vs 99%; P = 0.04). The rate of oral anticoagulation increased over time (75% vs 89%; P < 0.01), driven primarily by an increase in direct oral anticoagulants prescription (63% vs 84%; P < 0.01). In contrast to previous cohorts, there was no significant difference between the observed and the guideline-expected anticoagulation rate in cohort 2019 (89% vs 94%; P = 0.23). Conclusions A combination of expert guidance and educational initiatives in the past decade contributed to dramatic changes in the management of patients with AF undergoing PCI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beaulieu et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: