Key result
Preclinical obesity worsens stroke damage and inflammation, directly contrasting with the clinical obesity paradox.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Obesity is a risk factor for stroke and is consequently one of the most common co-morbidities found in patients. There is therefore an identified need to model co-morbidities preclinically to allow better translation from bench to bedside. In preclinical studies, both diet-induced and genetically obese rodents have worse stroke outcome, characterised by increased ischaemic damage and an altered inflammatory response. However, clinical studies have reported an 'obesity paradox' in stroke, characterised by reduced mortality and morbidity in obese patients. We discuss the potential reasons why the preclinical and clinical studies may not agree, and review the mechanisms identified in preclinical studies through which obesity may affects stroke outcome. We suggest inflammation plays a central role in this relationship, as obesity features increases in inflammatory mediators such as C-reactive protein and interleukin-6, and chronic inflammation has been linked to worse stroke risk and outcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Haley et al. (2016) conducted a review in Stroke and obesity. Obesity vs. Non-obese status was evaluated on Stroke outcome (ischaemic damage, mortality, and morbidity). Obesity worsens stroke outcomes in preclinical rodent models via increased ischemic damage and inflammation, contrasting with the clinical obesity paradox of reduced mortality in patients.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: