Why the study?
Prognostic prediction and the identification of prognostic factors are critical during the early period of AF-related strokes because AF is associated with poor outcomes in stroke patients.
Do machine learning models improve the prediction of short-term outcomes in patients with AF-related strokes compared to logistic regression?
Do machine learning models improve the prediction of short-term outcomes in patients with AF-related strokes compared to logistic regression?
Machine learning models, particularly multi-layer perceptrons, outperform traditional logistic regression in predicting 3-month functional outcomes and mortality in patients with AF-related stroke.
ML models may support early risk stratification in AF-stroke; leaves open need for prospective validation before practice change.
Background: Prognostic prediction and the identification of prognostic factors are critical during the early period of atrial-fibrillation (AF)-related strokes as AF is associated with poor outcomes in stroke patients. Methods: Two independent datasets, namely, the Korean Atrial Fibrillation Evaluation Registry in Ischemic Stroke Patients (K-ATTENTION) and the Korea University Stroke Registry (KUSR), were used for internal and external validation, respectively. These datasets include common variables such as demographic, laboratory, and imaging findings during early hospitalization. Outcomes were unfavorable functional status with modified Rankin scores of 3 or higher and mortality at 3 months. We developed two machine learning models, namely, a tree-based model and a multi-layer perceptron (MLP), along with a baseline logistic regression model. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was used as the outcome metric. The Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) method was used to evaluate the contributions of variables. Results: Machine learning models outperformed logistic regression in predicting both outcomes. For 3-month unfavorable outcomes, MLP exhibited significantly higher AUROC values of 0.890 and 0.859 in internal and external validation sets, respectively, than those of logistic regression. For 3-month mortality, both machine learning models exhibited significantly higher AUROC values than the logistic regression for internal validation but not for external validation. The most significant predictor for both outcomes was the initial National Institute of Health and Stroke Scale. Conclusion: The explainable machine learning model can reliably predict short-term outcomes and identify high-risk patients with AF-related strokes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jeon et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: