Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: CMV infection remains a significant clinical problem in the context of LT. Changes in the magnitude of the CMV-specific CTL response after LT have not previously been assessed but may be important in determining the outcome of CMV infection. METHOD: We used a fluorescent HLA-B*0702-CMV peptide tetrameric complex to directly visualize and quantitate CMV-specific CD8+ CTL both in immunosuppressed patients after LT and in immunocompetent controls. RESULTS: CMV-specific CD8+ CTL, at a frequency ranging from 0.1 to 5.8% of CD8+, were detected in the peripheral blood of 22 of 25 B*0702, CMV immunoglobulin G seropositive individuals, with no difference observed between immunocompetent controls and patients >3 years after LT. In CMV seropositive LT recipients who did not have symptomatic CMV infection during the first 3 months after LT, CMV-specific CD8+ CTL magnitude initially decreased, then increased up to 5 times higher than pre-LT levels within 3 months. Two CMV seronegative recipients of seropositive donors had symptomatic CMV infection in association with high viral load. In both patients, no CD8+ CTL response was detected before the onset of symptoms, and a reduction in viral load was observed during antiviral therapy. However, polymerase chain reaction negativity was achieved only when a demonstrable CMV-specific CD8+ CTL response was generated. Responses were never observed in asymptomatic CMV seronegative patients. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that the generation of CMV-specific CD8+ CTL may be driven by, and seems to coincide with the suppression of, viral reactivation. Direct monitoring of CMV-specific CD8+ CTL using an HLA-peptide tetramer may prove to be of value in the management of patients after LT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Singhal et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: