Why the study?
Preoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio shows promise for predicting outcomes in congenital heart surgery, but questions remain regarding normal pediatric values, optimal cutoffs, biomarker correlations, and modifiability.
Does preoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio predict adverse outcomes in patients undergoing congenital heart surgery?
Does preoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio predict adverse outcomes in patients undergoing congenital heart surgery?
Preoperative NLR is a promising, accessible biomarker for predicting adverse outcomes in congenital heart surgery, but standardized cutoffs for pediatric populations are still needed.
NLR may aid preoperative risk stratification in congenital heart repair; leaves open need for prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Operative mortality after repair of congenital heart disease has improved dramatically over the past few decades. Nevertheless, there is always room for the additional mitigation of complications and mortality. Being able to anticipate adverse outcomes is clearly important, especially when using low-cost and easily accessible resources. The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is defined as the ratio of the absolute neutrophil to lymphocyte count, which can be easily measured using a regular white blood cell count. Recently, preoperative NLR has been shown to be a predictor of outcomes in patients undergoing congenital heart surgery. Although it presented promising results, there are still many gaps to be filled like the normal value for children, the ideal cutoff value to predict adverse outcomes, the wide variation and its correlation with other biomarkers, and if it is a modifiable risk factor. The aim of this review is to understand the prognostic value of preoperative NLR as a biomarker predictor of outcomes in patients undergoing congenital heart surgery based on previous clinical studies and to propose future directions in order to solve the above-mentioned questions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Manuel et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: