Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We document that the risk-adjusted returns on initial public offerings (IPOs) in the short-term aftermarket are in the same direction as their initial mispricing. The initially underpriced issues earn 2.46% (6.40%) more, on average, than similar sized firms over the first month (first three months) of trading. In contrast, overpriced IPOs underperform size-matched firms, on average, by 4.42% (1.31%) over a similar period. Subsequently, both groups of IPOs earn similar negative abnormal returns, which is consistent with the long-term underperformance of IPOs reported in previous studies. Further scrutiny indicates that the observed condition price trends cannot be satisfactorily explained by underwriter price stabilization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Affleck‐Graves et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: