Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Seedlings of Chenopodium rubrum were grown on a fully defined medium and induced to flower by exposure to cycles of 8 hr light/16 hr darkness. The development of the anthers was studied using histochemical techniques. Particular attention was paid to the delayed development of the endothecium or fibrous layer and to the chemistry of the endothecial bars of thickening. These bars were found to consist mainly of α-cellulose as defined by insolubility in 17.5% NaOH. In contrast, most of the wall material in the other tissues of the another was low in oriented α-cellulose and consisted of pectic substances (0.5% ammonium oxalate soluble), hemicelluloses (4% NaOH soluble) and non-cellulosic polysaccharides (17.5% NaOH soluble); callose (defined as positive to lacmoid) was also detected as a transient material. Lignin was not detected in the endothecial bars of thickening. The concept of programmed control of tapetal and sporogenous tissues invoked in a paper by Heslop-Harrison (1964) has been extended to suggest an explanation for the delayed development of the endothecium. This hypothesis suggests that a product from the tapetum inhibits endothecial development during the major development of the anther and that only after sporopollenin synthesis in the tapetum has ceased does tapetal breakdown and consequent cessation of inhibition of the endothecium occur.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
R.A. de Fossard (1969) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: