Key result
Spinal ropivacaine dose requirements for successful anesthesia during cesarean delivery were similar across low, medium, and high BMI groups (p=0.915), though higher doses increased hypotension risk in obese patients.
Why the study?
Does body mass index affect the dose requirements of spinal ropivacaine and the incidence of hypotension in pregnant women undergoing cesarean delivery?
RCT (n=405)
Double-blind
Computer generated labels contained in opaque envelopes
No
Does body mass index affect the dose requirements of spinal ropivacaine and the incidence of hypotension in pregnant women undergoing cesarean delivery?
p-value: p=0.915
Spinal ropivacaine dose requirements for cesarean delivery are similar across normal to moderately obese BMI ranges, but higher doses significantly increase the risk of hypotension in obese patients.
BACKGROUND The effect of body mass index (BMI) on the spread of spinal anesthesia is not completely clear. The aim of this study was to determine the dose requirements of ropivacaine and the incidence of hypotension in pregnant women with different BMIs during cesarean delivery. MATERIAL AND METHODS In this double-blind study, 405 women undergoing elective cesarean delivery were allocated to group S (BMI <25), group M (25 ≤BMI <30), or group L (BMI ≥30). Women in each group were further assigned to receive 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, or 15 mg of spinal ropivacaine. RESULTS The ED50 and ED95 values of ropivacaine were 9.487 mg and 13.239 mg in Group S, 9.984 mg and 13.737 mg in Group M, and 9.067 mg and 12.819 mg in Group L. There were no significant differences among the 3 groups (p=0.915). Group L had a higher incidence of hypotension and a greater change in MAP after spinal anesthesia compared to the other 2 groups, and also required more doses of ephedrine than the other 2 groups when a dose of 15 mg ropivacaine was used. The incidence of hypotension had a positive correlation with the dose of ropivacaine (OR=1.453, p<0.001) and gestational age (OR=1.894, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Spinal ropivacaine dose requirements were similar in the normal BMI range. However, higher doses of spinal ropivacaine were associated with an increased incidence and severity of hypotension in obese patients compared with that in non-obese patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2018) conducted an RCT in Pregnancy requiring elective cesarean delivery (n=405). Spinal ropivacaine vs. Different BMI groups (BMI <25, 25-30, ≥30) was evaluated on Success of intrathecal block (ED50 and ED95 of ropivacaine) (p=0.915). Spinal ropivacaine dose requirements for successful anesthesia during cesarean delivery were similar across low, medium, and high BMI groups (p=0.915), though higher doses increased hypotension risk in obese patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: