Key result
Antiplatelet therapy regimens following coronary artery bypass grafting will be evaluated for efficacy and safety in this planned systematic review and network meta-analysis, which currently reports no clinical results.
Why the study?
Benefits of dual antiplatelet therapy are not well established in all CABG patients, and direct comparisons among various antiplatelet regimens remain limited.
Do various antiplatelet therapy regimens improve SVG patency, mortality, and bleeding in adult patients following CABG?
Systematic Review
Do various antiplatelet therapy regimens improve SVG patency, mortality, and bleeding in adult patients following CABG?
This protocol outlines a planned network meta-analysis to determine the optimal antiplatelet regimen for improving graft patency and clinical outcomes after CABG.
INTRODUCTION: Saphenous vein graft (SVG) is the most common conduit used for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery. Unfortunately, SVG are associated with poor long-term patency rates; a significant predictor of re-operation rates and survival. As such, medical therapy to prevent SVG narrowing or occlusion is of paramount importance. Aspirin (ASA) monotherapy is the standard of care after CABG, to improve long-term major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and graft patency. Benefits of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) have not been well established in all CABG patients. We present a protocol for a network meta-analysis (NMA) comparing the effects of various antiplatelet therapy regimens on SVG patency, mortality, and bleeding among adult patients following CABG. METHODS: We will search CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL ACPJC, and grey literature sources (AHA, ACC, ESC, and CCC conference proceedings, ISRCTN Register, and WHO ICTRP) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which fit our criteria. RCTs that evaluate different antiplatelet regimens at least 3-months after CABG and have any of SVG patency, mortality, MACE, and major bleeding as outcomes will be selected. We will perform title and abstract screening, full-text screening, and data extraction independently and in duplicate. Two independent reviewers will also assess risk of bias (ROB) for each study, as well as evaluate quality of evidence using the GRADE framework. We will use R to perform the NMA and use low-dose ASA as reference within our network. We will report results as odds ratios with confidence intervals for direct comparisons, and credible intervals for indirect or mixed comparisons. We will use the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) to estimate the ranking of interventions. DISCUSSION: Given the limited direct comparison of various antiplatelet regimens, a network approach is ideal to clarify the optimum antiplatelet therapy after CABG. We hope that our NMA will be the largest quantitative synthesis evaluating antiplatelet regimens among patients requiring CABG. It should inform clinicians and guideline developers in selecting the most effective and safest antiplatelet regimen.Systematic Review registration: International Prospective Register for Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO)-CRD42019127695.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gupta et al. (2019) conducted a systematic review in Coronary artery disease requiring coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Antiplatelet therapy (various regimens including DAPT and monotherapy) vs. Low-dose ASA or placebo was evaluated on Saphenous vein graft (SVG) patency, all-cause mortality, MACE, and major bleeding. Antiplatelet therapy regimens following coronary artery bypass grafting will be evaluated for efficacy and safety in this planned systematic review and network meta-analysis, which currently reports no clinical results.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: