Key result
Perioperative sacubitril/valsartan shows no significant difference in vasoplegic syndrome risk during cardiac surgery.
Why the study?
To determine the efficacy and safety of perioperative sacubitril/valsartan combination therapy in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
Does perioperative sacubitril/valsartan therapy improve clinical parameters and safety in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery?
Meta-Analysis (n=707)
Does perioperative sacubitril/valsartan therapy improve clinical parameters and safety in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery?
Perioperative use of sacubitril/valsartan in cardiac surgery appears safe and may improve clinical parameters, though current evidence is limited to small, heterogeneous studies.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Does not increase vasoplegic syndrome risk; supports safety evaluation while efficacy in cardiac surgery remains understudied.
Aim. To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies to determine the efficacy and safety of using sacubitril/valsartan combination in the perioperative period in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Material and methods. The search for studies was carried out in the PubMed (MEDLINE), Google Scholar and Cochrane library databases. The inclusion criteria for studies were the use of sacubitril/valsartan combination in the perioperative period in adult patients undergoing open-heart cardiac surgery with adequately presented baseline parameters and clinical outcome data. Results. Seven studies from 459 publications were selected for this systematic review. The total number of patients was 707, of which 452 were men (63,9%). Two studies described the use of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI) in the implantation of left ventricular assist device or heart transplant. A meta-analysis was performed on these studies, which demonstrated that the incidence of vasoplegic syndrome after these operations did not differ significantly between the ARNI group and the control group (relative risk 0,69; 95% confidence interval: 0,40-2,30; p=0,92). Also, two studies considered the results of therapy during coronary bypass grafting, while three studies — during the valve defect treatment. All studies demonstrated improvement in certain clinical parameters (ejection fraction and left ventricular (LV) size, cardiac index, natriuretic peptide levels, 6-minute walk test, etc.), as well as the safety of ARNI administration (no significant renal dysfunction and hypotension), including its early initiation after cardiac surgery. Conclusion. ARNI administration in the perioperative period has been studied in a limited and heterogeneous series of studies with small sample sizes, which are devoted to surgical treatment of end-stage heart failure, coronary artery disease and valve defects. Sacubitril/valsartan combination therapy demonstrated safety and efficacy in all groups considered. Further large controlled clinical trials are required to formulate reliable recommendations regarding the use of ARNI in the perioperative period.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Минаев et al. (2025) conducted a meta-analysis in Cardiac surgery (n=707). Sacubitril/valsartan vs. Control (standard therapy or no ARNI) was evaluated on Incidence of vasoplegic syndrome (in LVAD/heart transplant subgroup) (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.40-2.30, p=0.92). Perioperative sacubitril/valsartan therapy in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery demonstrated safety and efficacy, with no significant difference in the incidence of vasoplegic syndrome compared to control (RR 0.69, p=0.92).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: