Why the study?
Sacubitril/valsartan improves heart failure outcomes, but data regarding the use of ARNIs in patients with left ventricular assist devices remain limited.
Does sacubitril/valsartan (ARNI) improve clinical, structural, and hemodynamic parameters in patients using a durable left ventricular assist device?
Meta-Analysis (n=249)
Does sacubitril/valsartan (ARNI) improve clinical, structural, and hemodynamic parameters in patients using a durable left ventricular assist device?
Mean Difference: -630.07 (95% CI -1113.13–-147.01)
In patients with durable LVADs, ARNI therapy is associated with significant improvements in natriuretic peptides, diuretic requirements, and echocardiographic parameters, though limited by a 25% discontinuation rate.
Introduction: Sacubitril/valsartan is an angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) drug used to treat patients with heart failure and has shown improvement in outcomes. Different studies reported the use of an ARNI in patients using left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). However, there are limited data on the use of ARNIs in this population. We aimed to assess the efficacy of ARNIs in LVAD patients. Methods: A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane from inception to November 2024. We used all relevant words for “ARNI” and “LVAD” to search, and we included studies that assessed ARNIs in patients with LVAD. Efficacy and safety outcomes were extracted from the included studies. R software version 4.4.2 was used for a meta-analysis. Results: Seven studies totaling 249 patients were included. The ARNI was found to be effective in improvements from baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA), B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) (mean = −630.07 pg/mL, 95% CI [−1113.13, −147.01]), diuretic dose (furosemide equivalents) (mean= −76.05 mg/day, 95% CI [−145.11, −6.99]), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEED) (mean = −7.3 mm, 95% CI [−11.4, −3.1]), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (mean =5, 95% CI [3.52, 6.48]). No improvement was found in the creatinine (Cr) level. However, a slight increase in the potassium level was noticed (mean= 0.17 mEq/L, 95% CI [0.02, 0.34]). The overall mortality in patients using the ARNI was 5%, 95% CI [0.00, 20], and discontinuation was found in 25%, 95% CI [0, 100]. Conclusions: The ARNI improved several cardiac structural and hemodynamic parameters in patients on LVAD support.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hasabo et al. (2024) conducted a meta-analysis in Heart failure with durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) (n=249). Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor (ARNI) vs. Baseline was evaluated on Change in B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) from baseline (mean -630.07 pg/mL, 95% CI -1113.13, -147.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: