Key result
The ERAS-ESTS joint consensus provides 45 recommendations for enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery, though many components are strongly recommended despite a low quality of evidence.
Why the study?
Few thoracic anesthesia studies have adequately evaluated overall outcomes and quality of recovery, leaving several protocol components debatable and adherence poorly reported.
This review highlights the debatable viewpoints and challenges in implementing the 2019 ERATS protocols for thoracic anesthesia, emphasizing the need for more robust evidence.
Caution advised when adopting low-evidence ERAS recommendations in thoracic surgery; leaves open the need for RCTs to validate components.
In recent years, the concept of "Perioperative Medicine" has been evolved to a more concrete and sophisticated approach called "Enhanced Recovery After Surgery" (ERAS). ERAS has been first introduced in colorectal surgery by a dedicated leading ERAS® society, ERAS-criteria has been subsequently extended into several types of surgery, including thoracic surgery. Anesthesiology has always been one of the most important components of the multidisciplinary perioperative approaches, which is also valid for ERAS. There are several guidelines published on the enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery (ERATS). This article focuses on the "official" ERATS protocols of a joint consensus of two different societies. Regarding thoracic anesthesia, there are some challenges to be dealt with. The first challenge, although there is a large number of studies published on thoracic anesthesia, only a very few of them have studied the overall outcome and quality of recovery; and only few of them were powered enough to provide sufficient evidence. This has led to the fact that some components of the protocol are debatable. The second challenge, the adherence to individual elements and the overall compliance are poorly reported and also hard to apply even in the best organized centers. This article explains and discusses the debatable viewpoints on the elements of the ERATS protocol published in 2019 aiming to achieve a list for the future steps required for a more effective and evidence-based ERATS protocol.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Şentürk et al. (2021) conducted a review in Thoracic surgery. Enhanced Recovery After Thoracic Surgery (ERATS) protocols was evaluated. The ERAS-ESTS joint consensus provides 45 recommendations for enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery, though many components are strongly recommended despite a low quality of evidence.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: