Key result
Total protein to creatinine ratio (TPCR) demonstrated a sensitivity of 76% and specificity of 58% for detecting albuminuria at a cutoff of 95 mg/g (AUC=0.74, p<0.01).
Why the study?
Assessing urine microalbumin is unaffordable for regular monitoring in countries like Nepal, so evaluating whether the cheaper total protein to creatinine ratio can predict microalbuminuria is needed.
Does total protein to creatinine ratio (TPCR) accurately predict microalbuminuria compared to albumin to creatinine ratio (ACR) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?
Cross-Sectional
Does total protein to creatinine ratio (TPCR) accurately predict microalbuminuria compared to albumin to creatinine ratio (ACR) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.74
p-value: p=< 0.01
TPCR may serve as a cost-effective alternative to ACR for predicting microalbuminuria in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in resource-limited settings.
Background: Diabetic nephropathy is the most common complication of diabetes mellitus. Early detection of microalbumin in urine plays an important role in preventing the progression to late stages of chronic kidney disease. For a country like Nepal, the cost of assessment of microalbumin in urine is unaffordable by many patients for regular monitoring. Total protein to creatinine ratio (TPCR) might be a cheaper alternative for this. This study assessed the feasibility of using TPCR as an alternative method for predicting microalbuminuria in diabetic patients. Methods: Type 2 Diabetic patients with age ranging 30-80 years were included in the study after ethical clearance. Urinary total protein was determined by pyrogallol red method and urinary creatinine by Jaffe’s method. Urine for microalbumin was determined by nephelometry. Relationships between variables were examined by Pearson correlation or Spearman’s correlation analysis as appropriate. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to obtain the cutoff value of TPCR for detection of albuminuria Results: The mean age of the study population was 55.9 ± 11.8 years. There was significant positive correlation between TPCR and urine albumin (ρ = 0.56; p <0.01) and between TPCR and ACR (ρ = 0.47; p < 0.01). The regression equation for TPCR and ACR was, ACR = 0.82 TPCR = 70.5, r2 = 0.88. ROC curve analysis showed that the urine TPCR had a sensitivity and specificity of 76% and 58% respectively, for the detection of albuminuria with a cutoff value of 95 mg/g(AUC=0.74, p < 0.01). Conclusions: TPCR might be the cheaper alternative for the prediction of microalbuminuria in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pokharel et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Total protein to creatinine ratio (TPCR) vs. Albumin to creatinine ratio (ACR) was evaluated on Detection of albuminuria (AUC 0.74, p=< 0.01). Total protein to creatinine ratio (TPCR) demonstrated a sensitivity of 76% and specificity of 58% for detecting albuminuria at a cutoff of 95 mg/g (AUC=0.74, p<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: