Key result
Dynamic upper-body exercise in a cold environment increased rate pressure product by 18.1-24.4% compared to a neutral environment in patients with stable coronary artery disease.
Why the study?
Upper-body exercise in a cold environment may increase cardiovascular strain, potentially causing detriment to patients with CAD.
Does upper-body exercise in a cold environment increase cardiovascular strain compared to a neutral environment in patients with stable coronary artery disease?
RCT (n=20)
Random order (crossover)
No
Does upper-body exercise in a cold environment increase cardiovascular strain compared to a neutral environment in patients with stable coronary artery disease?
Upper-body exercise in a cold environment increases cardiovascular strain in patients with stable coronary artery disease, but does not cause marked changes in electric cardiac function, supporting its overall safety.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Patients with stable CAD may face higher myocardial demand during cold upper-body exercise; leaves open effects on ischemia or events.
PURPOSE: Upper-body exercise performed in a cold environment may increase cardiovascular strain, which could be detrimental to patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). This study compared cardiovascular responses of CAD patients during graded upper-body dynamic and static exercise in cold and neutral environments. METHODS: 20 patients with stable CAD performed 30 min of progressive dynamic (light, moderate, and heavy rating of perceived exertion) and static (10, 15, 20, 25 and 30% of maximal voluntary contraction) upper body exercise in cold (- 15 °C) and neutral (+ 22 °C) environments. Heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP) and electrocardiographic (ECG) responses were recorded and rate pressure product (RPP) calculated. RESULTS: Dynamic-graded upper-body exercise in the cold increased HR by 2.3-4.8% (p = 0.002-0.040), MAP by 3.9-5.9% (p = 0.038-0.454) and RPP by 18.1-24.4% (p = 0.002-0.020) when compared to the neutral environment. Static graded upper-body exercise in the cold resulted in higher MAP (6.3-9.1%; p = 0.000-0.014), lower HR (4.1-7.2%; p = 0.009-0.033), but unaltered RPP compared to a neutral environment. Heavy dynamic exercise resulted in ST depression that was not related to temperature. Otherwise, ECG was largely unaltered during exercise in either thermal condition. CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic- and static-graded upper-body exercise in the cold involves higher cardiovascular strain compared with a neutral environment among patients with stable CAD. However, no marked changes in electric cardiac function were observed. The results support the use of upper-body exercise in the cold in patients with stable CAD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial registration NCT02855905 August 2016.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Valtonen et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Stable coronary artery disease (n=20). Upper-body exercise in a cold environment (-15 °C) vs. Upper-body exercise in a neutral environment (+22 °C) was evaluated on Rate pressure product (RPP) during dynamic upper-body exercise (18.1-24.4% increase, p=0.002-0.020). Dynamic upper-body exercise in a cold environment increased rate pressure product by 18.1-24.4% compared to a neutral environment in patients with stable coronary artery disease.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: