Key result
In older adults admitted to long-term care hospitals, the point prevalence of atrial fibrillation was 29.6%, yet only 48.4% of these patients received oral anticoagulation for stroke prevention.
Why the study?
The study aimed to investigate the prevalence, incidence, clinical characteristics, risk profiles, anticoagulant management, and clinical outcomes of AF in patients admitted to long-term care hospitals.
Does oral anticoagulation reduce the composite of TIA, stroke, or systemic arterial embolism in geriatric patients with atrial fibrillation in long-term care hospitals?
Cohort (n=1,148)
Yes
Does oral anticoagulation reduce the composite of TIA, stroke, or systemic arterial embolism in geriatric patients with atrial fibrillation in long-term care hospitals?
In geriatric patients in long-term care hospitals, atrial fibrillation is highly prevalent (29.6%), yet only about half receive oral anticoagulation, which was not independently associated with reduced mortality in this frail population.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
High AF burden with suboptimal anticoagulation in long-term care warrants attention; leaves open optimal stroke prevention strategies in this frail population.
Aim of this study was investigate the prevalence and incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) and to describe the clinical characteristics, risk profiles, and types of anticoagulant therapy for stroke prevention and the clinical outcomes in persons admitted to a long-term care hospital. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the electronic medical records of patients aged 65 years or older living in two long-term care hospitals between January 1, 2014 and October 31, 2017. Overall data from 1148 patients (mean age 84.1 ± 7.9 years, 74.2% women) were analyzed. At baseline, the median CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score was 4 (IQR 3–5) and the HAS-BLED score 2 (IQR 2–3). We observed patients over a median period of 3.7 years. The point prevalence of AF was 29.6% (95% CI 25.8–33.7) on January 1, 2014. The 1-year cumulative incidence of de novo AF was 4.0% (2.8–5.6). Oral anticoagulants were prescribed in 48% of patients with AF. The cumulative incidence at 1 year for a composite outcome of TIA, stroke, or systemic arterial embolism was 0.6% (0.1–3.1) and 1.7% (0.5–4.6) and for bleeding 2.6% (0.9–6.2) and 1.8% (0.5–4.8) in patients with AF and oral anticoagulants or no oral anticoagulants, respectively. In long-term care hospital patients, we observed a high burden of AF. However, only about half of patients with AF received oral anticoagulation for stroke prevention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wagner et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=1,148). Atrial fibrillation vs. No atrial fibrillation was evaluated on Point prevalence of atrial fibrillation on January 1, 2014 (95% CI 25.8-33.7). In older adults admitted to long-term care hospitals, the point prevalence of atrial fibrillation was 29.6%, yet only 48.4% of these patients received oral anticoagulation for stroke prevention.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: