Why the study?
Despite existing guidelines for cardiovascular genetic testing, there is a paucity of pediatric-focused statements addressing the unique challenges of testing in infants, children, and adolescents.
This American Heart Association scientific statement establishes comprehensive pediatric-focused recommendations for the appropriate selection, timing, assent/consent processes, and multidisciplinary genetic counseling required for cardiovascular genetic testing in children.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Informs individualized pediatric cardiovascular genetic testing decisions; extends AHA guidance to children with assent and counseling standards.
Genetic diseases that affect the cardiovascular system are relatively common and include cardiac channelopathies, cardiomyopathies, aortopathies, hypercholesterolemias, and structural diseases of the heart and great vessels. The rapidly expanding availability of clinical genetic testing leverages decades of research into the genetic origins of these diseases, helping inform diagnosis, clinical management, and prognosis. Although a number of guidelines and statements detail best practices for cardiovascular genetic testing, there is a paucity of pediatric-focused statements addressing the unique challenges in testing in this vulnerable population. In this scientific statement, we seek to coalesce the existing literature around the use of genetic testing for cardiovascular disease in infants, children, and adolescents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Landstrom et al. (2021) studied Heritable cardiovascular diseases in pediatric patients (cardiac channelopathies, cardiomyopathies, aortopathies, familial hypercholesterolemias, and congenital heart defects). Clinical cardiovascular genetic testing (diagnostic and risk-predictive testing via cytogenetic and molecular genetic testing, accompanied by multidisciplinary pretest and posttest counseling) was evaluated. Cardiovascular genetic testing in children requires individualized timing, age-appropriate assent, and multidisciplinary pretest and posttest genetic counseling.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: