Key result
Surgical removal of an intrapericardial bullet and pericardiectomy successfully treated a 32-year-old man who developed sterile pericarditis and cardiac tamponade three months after a gunshot injury.
Case Report (n=1)
No
Intrapericardial foreign bodies should be removed to prevent delayed complications such as sterile pericarditis and cardiac tamponade.
May support surgical extraction for delayed tamponade after gunshot injury; leaves open need for prospective data on retained intrapericardial projectiles.
Patients with bullets in the pericardial sac without myocardial injuries are rare and most commonly are associated with significant trauma. The diagnosis of an intrapericardial foreign body can be difficult. Its removal is always indicated because it prevents pericarditis either sterile or infectious with potential for other significant complications. The syndrome of acute intermittent pericarditis from a foreign body within the pericardium is rarely seen except during time of war. Recently the authors treated a patient with a bullet in the pericardium three month following gunshot injury. During this period the patient developed sterile pericarditis and tamponade which necessitated emergency pericardiectomy and removal of the bullet. This experience and a brief review of the pertinent literature follows.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rajeev Mathur (2013) conducted a case report in Sterile pericarditis and cardiac tamponade from intrapericardial foreign body (n=1). Pericardiectomy and bullet removal was evaluated on Clinical recovery. Surgical removal of an intrapericardial bullet and pericardiectomy successfully treated a 32-year-old man who developed sterile pericarditis and cardiac tamponade three months after a gunshot injury.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: