Key result
PhonoCardioScan screening detects ~5 heart disease cases per 1,000 school children.
Observational
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Since 1959, auscultation by physicians in screening 49,496 school children has yielded 4.5 cases of heart disease/1,000 students screened. Sensitivity by analysis of "inserted" cases averages 64%, but varies with capabilities of examining physicians. X-ray and ECG evaluations on smaller populations have yielded, respectively, 2.7 and 2.8 cases/1,000 children screened, and sensitivity results average 30 to 40%. The tape-recorded heart sounds technique has yielded 2.9 cases/1,000 in screening 188,925 children. Sensitivity by analysis of "inserted" cases averages 75% and, in the population of "naturally occurring" heart disease, 56%. In 23,148 school children, an analog-digital device (PhonoCardioScan) has yielded 4.8 cases/1,000 children screened. Of "inserted" cases, 69% have been detected. Sixtyfour to 80% of "naturally occurring" cases have been detected. With each technique, approximately 40% of the heart disease detected had been previously unknown. The specificity of these methods ranges from 95 to 99%. For primary screening the analog-digital device is the most effective currently available alternative to examination by cardiologists.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Henikoff et al. (1968) conducted an observational in Pediatric heart disease. Analog-digital heart sound screening device (PhonoCardioScan) vs. Physician auscultation, tape-recorded heart sounds, X-ray, and ECG was evaluated on Heart disease detection rate per 1,000 school children screened. Screening school children with an analog-digital device (PhonoCardioScan) yielded 4.8 heart disease cases per 1,000 screened with 64-80% sensitivity for naturally occurring cases.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: