Key result
The KidneyOnline intelligent patient care system was associated with a reduced risk of the primary composite kidney outcome compared to conventional care (HR 0.391; 95% CI 0.231-0.660; P<.001).
Why the study?
Chronic kidney disease is a global health burden, but the efficacy of different eHealth care modes in facilitating self-management is unclear.
Does the KidneyOnline intelligent care system reduce the risk of composite kidney outcomes in nondiabetic patients with chronic kidney disease?
Cohort (n=902)
Does the KidneyOnline intelligent care system reduce the risk of composite kidney outcomes in nondiabetic patients with chronic kidney disease?
Hazard Ratio: 0.391 (95% CI 0.231–0.66)
Absolute Event Rate: 6% vs 7%
p-value: p=<.001
The use of an AI-based health coaching mobile app significantly reduced the risk of unfavorable composite kidney outcomes and improved blood pressure control in nondiabetic patients with CKD.
BACKGROUND Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a global health burden. However, the efficacy of different modes of eHealth care in facilitating self-management for patients with CKD is unclear. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a mobile app–based intelligent care system in improving the kidney outcomes of patients with CKD. METHODS Our study was a retrospective analysis based on the KidneyOnline intelligent system developed in China. Patients with CKD but not dependent on dialysis who registered on the KidneyOnline app between January 2017 and January 2021 were screened. Patients in the the KidneyOnline intelligent system group and those in the conventional care group were 1:1 matched according to their baseline characteristics. The intervention group received center-based follow-up combined with the KidneyOnline intelligent patient care system, which was a nurse-led, patient-oriented collaborative management system. Health-related data uploaded by the patients were integrated using deep learning optical character recognition (OCR). Artificial intelligence (AI)–generated personalized recipes, lifestyle intervention suggestions, early warnings, real-time questions and answers, and personalized follow-up plans were also provided. Patients in the conventional group could get professional suggestions from the nephrologists through regular clinical visits, but they did not have access to the service provided by AI and the health coach team. Patients were followed for at least 3 months after recruitment or until death or start of renal replacement therapy. RESULTS A total of 2060 eligible patients who registered on the KidneyOnline app from 2017 to 2021 were enrolled for the analysis. Of those, 902 (43.8%) patients were assessed for survival analysis after propensity score matching, with 451(50%) patients in the KidneyOnline intelligent patient care system group and 451(50%) patients in the conventional care group. After a mean follow-up period of 15.8 (SD 9.5) months, the primary composite kidney outcome occurred in 28 (6%) participants in the KidneyOnline intelligent patient care system group and 32 (7%) in the conventional care group, with a hazard ratio of 0.391 (95% CI 0.231-0.660; P<.001). Subgroup survival analysis demonstrated that the KidneyOnline care system significantly reduced the risk of composite kidney outcome, irrespective of age, sex, baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and proteinuria. In addition, the mean arterial pressure (MAP) significantly decreased from 88.9 (SD 10.5) mmHg at baseline to 85.6 (SD 7.9) mmHg at 6 months (P<.001) in the KidneyOnline intelligent patient care system group and from 89.3 (SD 11.1) mmHg to 87.5 (SD 8.2) mmHg (P=.002) in the conventional CKD care group. CONCLUSIONS The utilization of the KidneyOnline intelligent care system was associated with reduced risk of unfavorable kidney outcomes in nondiabetic patients with CKD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Nondiabetic chronic kidney disease (n=902). KidneyOnline intelligent patient care system vs. Conventional care was evaluated on Primary composite kidney outcome (HR 0.391, 95% CI 0.231-0.660, p=<.001). The KidneyOnline intelligent patient care system was associated with a reduced risk of the primary composite kidney outcome compared to conventional care (HR 0.391; 95% CI 0.231-0.660; P<.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: