Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In an attempt to gain an understanding of the mechanism by which toxins enter cells, we have analyzed the intoxication of diphtheria toxin in the toxin-resistant L cell and compared these results with those previously reported for toxin-sensitive HeLa and KB cells (Uchida, T., Pappenheimer, A. M., Jr., and Harper, A. A. (1973) J. Biol. Chem. 248, 3845-3850; Moehring, J. M., and Moehring, T. J. (1976) Infect. Immun. 13, 221-228). The inactivation of protein synthesis in diphtheria toxin-treated L cells is characterized by first order inactivation kinetics and a concentration-dependent lag phase. The log rate of inactivation of protein synthesis when plotted versus toxin concentration yields a complex hyperbola with a saturable component detected in the range of 5 to 10 X 10(-5) M. We conclude that the intoxication of L cells by diphtheria toxin in the range of 10(-8) to 5 X 10(-6) M occurs via a saturable process and that the saturable component probably represents a plasma membrane toxin receptor with an affinity 200-fold lower than that found in sensitive HeLa cells. Since L cells require a 10(4)- to 10(5)-fold higher toxin dose than HeLa cells, a 200-fold affinity difference cannot fully explain the resistance of L cells to diphtheria toxin. In addition, L cells must have either fewer toxin receptors or a deficiency in the transport step(s). Because toxin-exposed L cells in contrast to sensitive cells exhibit different behavior with respect to pH and pH reversal of NH4Cl protection, a deficiency in the transport step is considered the more likely case.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heagy et al. (1981) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: