Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Earlier we described the synthesis of a toxic, disulfide-linked conjugate between Fragment A from diphtheria toxin (DTA) and the lectin concanavalin A (Con A). Here we report further characterization of this Con A-SS-DTA conjugate and of a nontoxic conjugate containing DTA linked through a disulfide bridge to the binding subunit of ricin toxin, RTB. The Con A-SS-DTA conjugate preparation was heterogeneous, and contained both divalent and tetravalent forms of Con A linked to DTA. The divalent form of the conjugate, which lacked hemagglutination activity, was as toxic as the tetravalent form for 3T3 cells. Consistent with this result, Con A-SS-DTA analogs prepared with the chemically modified dimeric derivatives of Con A, succinyl-Con A and acetyl-Con A, were as toxic as DTA disulfide linked to tetravalent Con A. Two analogs of Con A-SS-DTA containing nonreducible intermolecular linkages between DTA and Con A were at least 1000-fold less toxic than Con A-SS-DTA, although they were indistinguishable from unmodified Con A in binding to 3T3 cells. This suggests that reduction of the disulfide bridge between Con A and DTA may be necessary for conjugate toxicity. Con A-SS-DTA was equally toxic for a variety of cell lines varying in sensitivity to diphtheria toxin, including Vero, CHO, HeLa, and 3T3. The conjugate was also toxic for a diphtheria toxin-resistant variant of V79 cells (V79 Dtxr-3) that has lower affinity than wild type cells for diphtheria toxin. Chloroquine, colchicine, cytochalasin B, and ammonium chloride had no effect on Con A-SS-DTA toxicity for Vero cells, although ammonium chloride and chloroquine inhibited diphtheria toxin action.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gilliland et al. (1981) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: