Key result
Intravascular ultrasound during carotid artery stenting is feasible and safe, but there is currently limited evidence demonstrating direct improvement in procedural or clinical outcomes.
Why the study?
Does intravascular ultrasound improve procedural outcomes in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting?
Does intravascular ultrasound improve procedural outcomes in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting?
While IVUS is feasible and safe during carotid artery stenting, there is currently limited evidence that it improves clinical or procedural outcomes.
For patients at high risk for surgery, carotid artery stenting (CAS) is a viable alternative to help reduce risk of stroke for patients with high-grade carotid artery stenosis; however, a higher incidence of perioperative stroke has been observed in patients undergoing stenting compared to those undergoing open surgery. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is commonly used during coronary artery procedures to help evaluate lesions and to guide stent placement. Multiple groups have sought to determine whether IVUS could also be used during CAS. While IVUS has been shown to be both feasible and safe during CAS, there is limited evidence that demonstrates direct improvement in procedural outcomes. Further studies focusing on clinical outcomes should be conducted in order to justify routine use of this technology during CAS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hitchner et al. (2015) conducted a review in High-grade carotid artery stenosis. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) was evaluated. Intravascular ultrasound during carotid artery stenting is feasible and safe, but there is currently limited evidence demonstrating direct improvement in procedural or clinical outcomes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: