Key result
Intravascular ultrasound identified a residual 70% cross-sectional area stenosis after balloon angioplasty that was missed by angiography, guiding subsequent stent placement.
Why the study?
Does IVUS improve the assessment of angioplasty outcome and luminal volume compared to angiography in a patient with symptomatic internal carotid artery occlusive disease?
Case Report (n=1)
Does IVUS improve the assessment of angioplasty outcome and luminal volume compared to angiography in a patient with symptomatic internal carotid artery occlusive disease?
IVUS provides a more accurate assessment of residual stenosis and luminal volume following carotid angioplasty and stenting compared to angiography alone.
May support IVUS to detect missed residual carotid stenosis; hypothesis-generating case report leaves open routine adoption.
PURPOSE: To illustrate the utility of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging during endoluminal interventions in the carotid artery. METHODS AND RESULTS: A patient with symptomatic internal carotid artery occlusive disease was treated with balloon angioplasty and evaluated with both angiography (interpreted as a widely patent outcome) and IVUS, which identified a residual 70% cross-sectional area stenosis. A stent was placed across the lesion, producing a 70% increase in the lumen as documented by IVUS in comparison to the cross-sectional area of the reference vessel. Postprocedural angiography of the stented segment showed only an approximate 20% increase in diameter. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the utility of IVUS for accurate assessment of angioplasty outcome and for quantitative assessment of luminal volume following intervention and stent placement. The case emphasizes the need for IVUS as an integral part of the procedure to ensure adequate treatment and to accurately document the residual lesion for assessment of recurrence phenomena at follow-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wilson et al. (1996) conducted a case report in Symptomatic internal carotid artery occlusive disease (n=1). Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) vs. Angiography was evaluated on Assessment of angioplasty outcome and luminal volume. Intravascular ultrasound identified a residual 70% cross-sectional area stenosis after balloon angioplasty that was missed by angiography, guiding subsequent stent placement.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: