Key result
Manual border correction in VH IVUS images showed substantial inter-observer agreement for necrotic core percentage (κ=0.63) and moderate agreement for plaque classification (κ=0.60).
Why the study?
What is the inter-observer reproducibility of manual border correction in VH IVUS images for carotid atherosclerotic plaque assessment?
Observational (n=51)
What is the inter-observer reproducibility of manual border correction in VH IVUS images for carotid atherosclerotic plaque assessment?
Effect estimate: κ=0.63 for necrotic core percentage; κ=0.60 for plaque classification
Manual border correction in VH IVUS for carotid plaque assessment shows moderate to substantial inter-observer agreement, but its time-consuming nature necessitates improved automatic algorithms.
Plaque composition is a potentially important diagnostic feature for carotid artery stenting (CAS). The purpose of this investigation is to evaluate the reproducibility of manual border correction in intravascular ultrasound with virtual histology (VH IVUS) images. Three images each were obtained from 51 CAS datasets on which automatic border detection was corrected manually by two trained observers. Plaque was classified using the definitions from the CAPITAL (Carotid Artery Plaque Virtual Histology Evaluation) study, listed in order from least to most pathological: no plaque, pathological intimal thickening, fibroatheroma, fibrocalcific, calcified fibroatheroma, thin-cap fibroatheroma, and calcified thin-cap fibroatheroma. Inter-observer variability was quantified using both weighted and unweighted Kappa statistics. Bland-Altman analysis was used to compare the cross-sectional areas of the vessel and lumen. Agreement using necrotic core percentage as the criterion was evaluated using the unweighted Kappa statistic. Agreement between classifications of plaque type was evaluated using the weighted Kappa statistic. There was substantial agreement between the observers based on necrotic core percentage (κ=0.63), while the agreement was moderate (κ(quadratic)=0.60) based on plaque classification. Due to the time-consuming nature of manual border detection, an improved automatic border detection algorithm is necessary for using VH IVUS as a diagnostic tool for assessing the suitability of patients with carotid artery occlusive disease for CAS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Siewiorek et al. (2011) conducted an observational in Carotid artery occlusive disease (n=51). Manual border correction in VH IVUS images vs. Inter-observer agreement was evaluated on Inter-observer agreement based on necrotic core percentage and plaque classification (κ=0.63 for necrotic core percentage; κ=0.60 for plaque classification). Manual border correction in VH IVUS images showed substantial inter-observer agreement for necrotic core percentage (κ=0.63) and moderate agreement for plaque classification (κ=0.60).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: