Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
How the possibility of a better strain relaxation introduced by the surface roughness can modify alloy demixing is investigated here. We propose a step-by-step model to simulate the growth process on a rough surface. We use an atomistic description and also consider the surface tension difference between the two binaries that form the ternary alloy. This study clearly shows how and why---in the lattice-matched case---the atoms corresponding to the binary materials with the lowest surface tension naturally tends to segregate towards initially sloping areas, whereas---in the mismatched case---upper areas are enriched in the more strained binary. The results are exemplified by Al0.5In0.5As lattice matched or not to its substrate. Throughout this article, we discuss the balance among mixing enthalpy, strains, and the difference of surface tension between the two binaries that form the ternary alloy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Priester et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: