Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We strongly support Guryanov’s speculation—that a thinner wetting layer is expected with quantum dots (QDs) grown by migration-enhanced epitaxy—with structural and optical measurements. InAs QDs grown by migration-enhanced molecular-beam epitaxy showed a larger size, lower density, ∼40% enhanced uniformity, ∼2 times larger aspect ratio, and a measurement temperature insensitivity of the photoluminescence linewidth compared to QDs grown by conventional molecular-beam epitaxy. The thickness of the wetting layer for the migration-enhanced epitaxial InAs QD (2.1nm) was thinner than that of the counterpart (4.0nm).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cho et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: