Why the study?
Does the MGuard stent prevent distal embolization and improve outcomes in patients undergoing PCI for unstable lesions?
Does the MGuard stent prevent distal embolization and improve outcomes in patients undergoing PCI for unstable lesions?
The MGuard stent demonstrated excellent preliminary safety and efficacy in preventing distal embolization during PCI in highly complex lesions.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Should not yet change practice; leaves open whether MGuard reduces embolization versus standard stents in randomized complex PCI trials.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of the MGuard(TM) stent combining a polymer-mesh sleeve attached to the external surface of a bare-metal stent in preventing distal embolization during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: Distal embolization of thrombus/platelet aggregates is associated with worse immediate and long-term prognosis after PCI. Treatment of saphenous vein graft (SVG) and PCI in the setting of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) is often related to this complication. Although protection and aspiration devices have been shown to reduce distal embolization, they add time and cost to PCI. METHODS: A total of 30 patients were included. Inclusion criteria were de novo lesions in SVG or native vessels with angiographic evidence of instability with potential to provoke flow disturbances and/or distal embolization. Primary endpoint included the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (composite of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and TLR) up to 30 days of the procedure and TIMI flow right after the PCI. RESULTS: Mean population age was 60.8 years with 36.7% of diabetes. Overall, 53.3% presented with ACS, and most lesions were located in SVG (16 of 30). The majority of lesions had complex morphology including the presence of thrombus (30%) and ulcer (33.3%). The MGuard stent was successfully deployed in all cases with no angiographic/clinical complications including distal embolization. Final TIMI-3/blush-3 were achieved in all cases with no MACE up to 30 days of the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: In this preliminary evaluation, the MGuard device demonstrated excellent performance in a highly complex lesion subset, including absence of angiographic/procedural complications, and no adverse events up to 30-day FU.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maia et al. (2010) studied de novo lesions in SVG or native vessels with angiographic evidence of instability (n=30). MGuard stent system was evaluated on Incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (composite of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and TLR) up to 30 days of the procedure and TIMI flow right after the PCI.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: