Key result
This protocol describes a planned randomized controlled trial to evaluate whether the MI-BP mobile health app improves blood pressure control compared with usual care in African Americans.
Why the study?
Does the MI-BP app improve blood pressure control and mean systolic BP in African Americans with uncontrolled hypertension?
RCT (n=396)
randomized
Yes
Does the MI-BP app improve blood pressure control and mean systolic BP in African Americans with uncontrolled hypertension?
This protocol outlines a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of a mobile health app (MI-BP) for improving blood pressure control among African Americans with uncontrolled hypertension.
BACKGROUND African Americans shoulder significant disparities related to hypertension (HTN), which is a serious public health problem in the city of Detroit, Michigan, where more than 80% of the population is African American. Connectivity through smartphones, use of home blood pressure (BP) monitoring, and newly developed mobile health (mHealth) interventions can facilitate behavioral changes and may improve long-term self-care for chronic conditions, but implementation of a combined approach utilizing these methods has not been tested among African American patients with uncontrolled HTN. Since African Americans are more likely than other racial or ethnic subgroups to utilize the emergency department (ED) for ambulatory care, this presents an opportunity to intervene on a population that is otherwise difficult to reach. OBJECTIVE The MI-BP app aims to reduce health disparities related to HTN in the community by employing a user-centered intervention focused on self-BP monitoring, physical activity, reduced sodium intake, and medication adherence. We seek to test the efficacy of MI-BP, an mHealth app for HTN self-management, on BP control (primary aim), physical activity, sodium intake, and medication adherence (secondary aim) in African Americans with HTN. This study also seeks to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of MI-BP when compared with usual care methods. METHODS This is a 1-year randomized controlled trial that will recruit individuals who have uncontrolled HTN from 2 EDs in the city of Detroit, with a planned sample size of 396 randomized participants. To be eligible for inclusion, potential participants must be African American, 25 to 70 years old, previously diagnosed with HTN, have a smartphone compatible with MI-BP, and have uncontrolled BP at triage and on repeat measurement at least 1-hour post triage vitals. Once a participant is deemed eligible, all study procedures and subsequent follow-up visits (8 in total) are conducted at the Wayne State University Clinical Research Service Center. We seek to determine the effect of MI-BP on BP for 1 year (using BP control and mean systolic BP as coprimary outcomes and physical activity, sodium intake, and medication adherence as secondary outcomes) compared with usual care controls. RESULTS Recruitment for this study began in January 2018. The study will continue through 2021. CONCLUSIONS As the first of its kind conducted in an ED setting, MI-BP was designed to document the efficacy and acceptability of a multicomponent mHealth approach to help African Americans with uncontrolled BP modify their lifestyle to better manage their HTN. We expect to lay the foundation to sustainably reduce HTN-related health disparities through better integration of multiple behavior self-monitoring and improve outcomes for those who traditionally rely on the ED for chronic disease care. CLINICALTRIAL ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02360293; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02360293 INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPOR RR1-10.2196/12601
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Buis et al. (2018) conducted an RCT in Uncontrolled hypertension (n=396). MI-BP app vs. usual care was evaluated on BP control and mean systolic BP. This protocol describes a planned randomized controlled trial to evaluate whether the MI-BP mobile health app improves blood pressure control compared with usual care in African Americans.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: