Key result
Compared with sham stimulation, transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation significantly reduced two-hour plasma glucose levels (p = 0.004) over 12 weeks in patients with impaired glucose tolerance.
Why the study?
Does transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) improve glucose tolerance in adults with impaired glucose tolerance?
RCT (n=102)
Single-blind
Computer-generated envelope
No
Does transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) improve glucose tolerance in adults with impaired glucose tolerance?
Absolute Event Rate: 7.5% vs 8%
p-value: p=0.004
Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation may be a simple, cost-effective intervention to improve glucose tolerance and lower systolic blood pressure in patients with pre-diabetes.
taVNS may offer a non-pharmacologic option for impaired glucose tolerance; extends vagal neuromodulation evidence to metabolic regulation.
BACKGROUND: Impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) is a pre-diabetic state of hyperglycemia that is associated with insulin resistance, increased risk of type II diabetes, and cardiovascular pathology. Recently, investigators hypothesized that decreased vagus nerve activity may be the underlying mechanism of metabolic syndrome including obesity, elevated glucose levels, and high blood pressure. METHODS: In this pilot randomized clinical trial, we compared the efficacy of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) and sham taVNS on patients with IGT. 72 participants with IGT were single-blinded and were randomly allocated by computer-generated envelope to either taVNS or sham taVNS treatment groups. In addition, 30 IGT adults were recruited as a control population and not assigned treatment so as to monitor the natural fluctuation of glucose tolerance in IGT patients. All treatments were self-administered by the patients at home after training at the hospital. Patients were instructed to fill in a patient diary booklet each day to describe any side effects after each treatment. The treatment period was 12 weeks in duration. Baseline comparison between treatment and control group showed no difference in weight, BMI, or measures of systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 2-hour plasma glucose (2hPG), or glycosylated hemoglobin (HbAlc). RESULTS: 100 participants completed the study and were included in data analysis. Two female patients (one in the taVNS group, one in the sham taVNS group) dropped out of the study due to stimulation-evoked dizziness. The symptoms were relieved after stopping treatment. Compared with sham taVNS, taVNS significantly reduced the two-hour glucose tolerance (F(2) = 5.79, p = 0.004). In addition, we found that taVNS significantly decreased (F(1) = 4.21, p = 0.044) systolic blood pressure over time compared with sham taVNS. Compared with the no-treatment control group, patients receiving taVNS significantly differed in measures of FPG (F(2) = 10.62, p < 0.001), 2hPG F(2) = 25.18, p < 0.001) and HbAlc (F(1) = 12.79, p = 0.001) over the course of the 12 week treatment period. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that taVNS is a promising, simple, and cost-effective treatment for IGT/ pre-diabetes with only slight risk of mild side-effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2014) conducted an RCT in Impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) (n=102). Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) vs. Sham taVNS and no-treatment control was evaluated on Change in 2-hour plasma glucose (2hPG) levels (p=0.004). Compared with sham stimulation, transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation significantly reduced two-hour plasma glucose levels (p = 0.004) over 12 weeks in patients with impaired glucose tolerance.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: