Key result
Doxazosin GITS achieved strict blood pressure control in 83% of patients compared to 79% with hydrochlorothiazide, while demonstrating a more favorable metabolic and electrolyte profile.
Why the study?
Does doxazosin GITS improve blood pressure and metabolic parameters compared to hydrochlorothiazide as add-on therapy in patients with uncontrolled hypertension?
RCT (n=98)
open-label
parallel-arm
Does doxazosin GITS improve blood pressure and metabolic parameters compared to hydrochlorothiazide as add-on therapy in patients with uncontrolled hypertension?
Absolute Event Rate: 83% vs 79%
Doxazosin GITS provides similar antihypertensive efficacy to hydrochlorothiazide as add-on therapy but with a more favorable metabolic and electrolyte profile.
Supports doxazosin GITS as metabolically preferable add-on in uncontrolled hypertension; extends RCT evidence on alpha-blocker alternatives to thiazides.
The objective of this prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel-arm comparative study, with a 4-month follow-up, was to assess the antihypertensive efficacy, tolerability and metabolic safety of doxazosin GITS (gastrointestinal therapeutic system) 4-8 mg/day vs hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5-25 mg/day as add-on therapy in patients not controlled with monotherapy with other drugs. Ninety-eight patients completed the study (mean age 57.4 +/- 15 years, 53% female). Mean systolic/diastolic blood pressure reduction was 8.2/4.5 mmHg in the HCTZ group and 8.9/5.0 mmHg in the doxazosin GITS group, and a strict blood pressure control was achieved in 79% and 83% of the patients, respectively. The incidence rates of adverse events were low and similar in both groups. However, metabolic differences were seen between the groups, doxazosin GITS vs HCTZ, respectively: total cholesterol (mg/dl) 210 +/- 53 vs 231 +/- 62 (p < 0.05), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (mg/dl) 139 +/- 40 vs 161 +/- 57 (p < 0.01), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (mg/dl) 58 +/- 16 vs 48 +/- 13 (p < 0.01), HDL/total cholesterol ratio 27.6 +/- 8 vs 21.2 +/- 7 (p < 0.001), plasma uric acid (mg/dl) 5.3 +/- 2.6 vs 6.8 +/- 3.1 (p < 0.05) and serum potassium (mEq/l) 4.1 +/- 1.3 vs. 3.7 +/- 1.2 (p < 0.01). In conclusion, doxazosin GITS has a tolerability and efficacy profile similar to low doses of thiazide diuretics, with a better evolution of metabolic and electrolyte parameters. Therefore, in patients not controlled with monotherapy, doxazosin GITS can be considered an alternative to the addition of thiazide diuretics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Campo et al. (2003) conducted an RCT in uncontrolled hypertension (n=98). doxazosin GITS vs. hydrochlorothiazide 12.5-25 mg/day was evaluated on strict blood pressure control. Doxazosin GITS achieved strict blood pressure control in 83% of patients compared to 79% with hydrochlorothiazide, while demonstrating a more favorable metabolic and electrolyte profile.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: