Key result
Objective physiological and ambient parameters collected via telemonitoring predicted patient-reported outcomes in congestive heart failure patients with an accuracy of up to 86% and an AUC of 0.835.
Why the study?
Does telemonitoring of physiological and ambient parameters predict patient-reported outcomes in congestive heart failure patients?
Observational (n=24)
Yes
Does telemonitoring of physiological and ambient parameters predict patient-reported outcomes in congestive heart failure patients?
Objective physiological and ambient parameters collected via telemonitoring can accurately predict patient-reported outcomes in congestive heart failure patients.
This paper addresses patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and telemonitoring in congestive heart failure (CHF), both increasingly important topics. The interest in CHF trials is shifting from hard end-points such as hospitalization and mortality, to softer end-points such health-related quality of life. However, the relation of these softer end-points to objective parameters is not well studied. Telemonitoring is suitable for collecting both patient-reported outcomes and objective parameters. Most telemonitoring studies, however, do not take full advantage of the available sensor technology and intelligent data analysis. The Chiron clinical observational study was performed among 24 CHF patients (17 men and 7 women, age 62.9 ± 9.4 years, 15 NYHA class II and 9 class III, 10 of ishaemic, aetiology, 6 dilated, 2 valvular, and 6 of multiple aetiologies or cardiomyopathy) in Italy and UK. A large number of physiological and ambient parameters were collected by wearable and other devices, together with PROs describing how well the patients felt, over 1,086 days of observation. The resulting data were mined for relations between the objective parameters and the PROs. The objective parameters (humidity, ambient temperature, blood pressure, SpO2, and sweeting intensity) could predict the PROs with accuracies up to 86% and AUC up to 0.83, making this the first report providing evidence for ambient and physiological parameters to be objectively related to PROs in CHF patients. We also analyzed the relations in the predictive models, gaining some insights into what affects the feeling of health, which was also generally not attempted in previous investigations. The paper strongly points to the possibility of using PROs as primary end-points in future trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mlakar et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Congestive heart failure (n=24). Telemonitoring of physiological and ambient parameters was evaluated on Prediction of patient-reported outcomes (feeling of health) (Accuracy 86%, AUC 0.835). Objective physiological and ambient parameters collected via telemonitoring predicted patient-reported outcomes in congestive heart failure patients with an accuracy of up to 86% and an AUC of 0.835.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: