Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Density functional theory (DFT-D) and semi-empirical (PM3-D) methods having an added empirical dispersion correction have been used to study the binding of a series of small molecules and planar aromatic molecules to single-walled carbon nanotubes (CNTs). For the small molecule set, the PM3-D method gives a mean unsigned error (MUE) in the binding energies of 1.2 kcal mol(-1) when judged against experimental reference data for graphitic carbon. This value is close to the MUE for this method compared to high-level ab initio data for biological complexes. The PM3-D and DFT-D calculations describing the adsorption of the planar organic molecules (benzene, bibenzene, naphthalene, anthracene, TCNQ and DDQ) on the outer-walls of both semi-conducting and metallic CNTs give similar binding energies for benzene and DDQ, but do not display a stronger adsorption on [6,6] compared to [10,0] structures shown by another DFT study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McNamara et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: