Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
August 9, 1965JAMA

Detection of Phantom Arrhythmias and Evanescent Electrocardiographic Abnormalities

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Why the study?

Does the Holter monitor detect phantom arrhythmias and evanescent electrocardiographic abnormalities in patients with distressing symptoms?

Population

Patients with distressing symptoms suspected of having phantom arrhythmias or evanescent cardiac abnormalities

Design

Other

Follow-up

up to 10 hours (monitoring duration)

Authors

ECEliot CordayCardiac Imaging

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

May aid symptom-arrhythmia correlation in select patients; leaves open impact on management and outcomes.

Structured PICO

Does the Holter monitor detect phantom arrhythmias and evanescent electrocardiographic abnormalities in patients with distressing symptoms?

P
Population
Patients with distressing symptoms (e.g., neurological symptoms due to cerebrovascular insufficiency, chest pain due to coronary insufficiency) suspected of having phantom arrhythmias or evanescent cardiac abnormalities
I
Intervention
Holter monitor for electrocardiographic monitoring for periods up to ten hours in the patient's native environment
O
Outcome
Detection of phantom arrhythmias and evanescent electrocardiographic abnormalities

The introduction of the Holter monitor enables the detection of transient arrhythmias and ECG abnormalities in a patient's native environment.

Cite This Study

Eliot Corday (1965) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a75c3ced17bc701ee161eedhttps://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1965.03090060007001
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Studies of Electrocardiographic Changes during Exercise (Modified Double Two-Step Test)1952 · 32 citations
  2. 2Monitored and Post-Exercise Two-Step Test1964 · 21 citations