Key result
In patients starting vitamin K antagonists, daily supplementation with 150 μg vitamin K1 resulted in a non-significant 2.7% increase in time in therapeutic range compared to placebo.
Why the study?
Does low-dose vitamin K1 supplementation improve the stability of anticoagulation therapy (time in therapeutic range) in patients starting vitamin K antagonists?
RCT (n=400)
Double-blind
Randomized
Yes
Does low-dose vitamin K1 supplementation improve the stability of anticoagulation therapy (time in therapeutic range) in patients starting vitamin K antagonists?
Mean Difference: 2.7 (95% CI -2.3–7.6)
Absolute Event Rate: 88.2% vs 84.3%
Routine supplementation with low-dose vitamin K1 in unselected patients starting vitamin K antagonists does not yield a clinically relevant improvement in anticoagulation stability.
Does not support routine low-dose vitamin K1 supplementation in new VKA users; confirms lack of clinically relevant TTR benefit.
BACKGROUND: Poor anticoagulant stability in patients using vitamin K antagonists is a risk factor for both bleeding and thrombosis. In previous studies supplementation with low dose vitamin K(1) was shown to improve the stability of anticoagulant control. We set up a study to confirm earlier reports and to determine the optimal daily dose of vitamin K(1) in preparation of a large study with clinical endpoints. DESIGN AND METHODS: Four hundred patients from two anticoagulation clinics starting with vitamin K antagonists, independently of a possible history of instable anticoagulation, were randomized to receive either placebo or 100, 150 or 200 μg of vitamin K(1) together with their treatment with vitamin K antagonists. The treatment was administered for 6 to 12 months. Anticoagulation stability, expressed as the percentage of time that the International Normalized Ratio was within the therapeutic range, was compared between the groups. RESULTS: After adjustment for age, sex, vitamin K antagonist used, anticoagulation clinic and interacting drugs as confounding factors the difference in percentage of time with the International Normalized Ratio within the therapeutic range between the placebo group and the vitamin K(1) groups was 2.1% (95% CI: -3.2% - 7.4%) for the group taking 100 μg, 2.7% (95% CI: -2.3% -7.6%) for the group taking 150 μg and 0.9% (95% CI: -4.5% - 6.3%) for the group taking 200 μg vitamin K(1) group, in favor of the vitamin K(1) groups. The patients from both the 100 μg group and the 150 μg group had a 2-fold higher chance of reaching at least 85% of time with the International Normalized Ratio within the therapeutic range. There were no differences in thromboembolic or hemorrhagic complications between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients starting vitamin K antagonists, supplementation with low dose vitamin K(1) resulted in an improvement of time that anticoagulation was within the therapeutic range. Differences between doses were, however, small and the improvement is unlikely to be of clinical relevance. For future studies we recommend selecting only patients with instable anticoagulant control. (This study was registered at www.isrctn.org as ISRCTN37109430).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gebuis et al. (2010) conducted an RCT in Patients starting oral anticoagulant therapy with vitamin K antagonists (n=400). Vitamin K1 vs. Placebo was evaluated on Percentage of time that the International Normalized Ratio was within the therapeutic range (TTR) (MD 2.7%, 95% CI -2.3 - 7.6). In patients starting vitamin K antagonists, daily supplementation with 150 μg vitamin K1 resulted in a non-significant 2.7% increase in time in therapeutic range compared to placebo.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: